{"formats":[{"name":"JSON","format":"json","url":"\/downloads\/2025\/code-json\/8.01-397.json"},{"name":"Plain Text","format":"text","url":"\/downloads\/2025\/code-text\/8.01-397.txt"},{"name":"XML","format":"xml","url":"\/downloads\/2025\/code-xml\/8.01-397.xml"},{"name":"HTML","format":"html","url":"\/downloads\/2025\/code-html\/8.01-397.html"}],"law_id":84174,"edition_id":1,"section_id":84174,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-397","catch_line":"Corroboration required and evidence receivable when one party incapable of testifying (subdivision (b)(5) of Supreme Court Rule 2:804 derived from this section)","history":"Code 1950, \u00a7 8-286; 1977, c. 617; 1988, c. 426; 2013, cc. 61, 637.","full_text":"In an action by or against a person who, from any cause, is incapable of testifying, or by or against the committee, trustee, executor, administrator, heir, or other representative of the person so incapable of testifying, no judgment or decree shall be rendered in favor of an adverse or interested party founded on his uncorroborated testimony. In any such action, whether such adverse party testifies or not, all entries, memoranda, and declarations by the party so incapable of testifying made while he was capable, relevant to the matter in issue, may be received as evidence in all proceedings including without limitation those to which a person under a disability is a party. The phrase &#8220;from any cause&#8221; as used in this section shall not include situations in which the party who is incapable of testifying has rendered himself unable to testify by an intentional self-inflicted injury.\n\t\tFor the purposes of this section, and in addition to corroboration by any other competent evidence, an entry authored by an adverse or interested party contained in a business record may be competent evidence for corroboration of the testimony of an adverse or interested party. If authentication of the business record is not admitted in a request for admission, such business record shall be authenticated by a person other than the author of the entry who is not an adverse or interested party whose conduct is at issue in the allegations of the complaint.","order_by":null,"text":{"0":{"id":301706,"text":"In an action by or against a person who, from any cause, is incapable of testifying, or by or against the committee, trustee, executor, administrator, heir, or other representative of the person so incapable of testifying, no judgment or decree shall be rendered in favor of an adverse or interested party founded on his uncorroborated testimony. In any such action, whether such adverse party testifies or not, all entries, memoranda, and declarations by the party so incapable of testifying made while he was capable, relevant to the matter in issue, may be received as evidence in all proceedings including without limitation those to which a person under a disability is a party. The phrase &#8220;from any cause&#8221; as used in this section shall not include situations in which the party who is incapable of testifying has rendered himself unable to testify by an intentional self-inflicted injury.\n\t\tFor the purposes of this section, and in addition to corroboration by any other competent evidence, an entry authored by an adverse or interested party contained in a business record may be competent evidence for corroboration of the testimony of an adverse or interested party. If authentication of the business record is not admitted in a request for admission, such business record shall be authenticated by a person other than the author of the entry who is not an adverse or interested party whose conduct is at issue in the allegations of the complaint.","type":"section","prefixes":[""],"prefix":"","entire_prefix":"","prefix_anchor":"","level":1}},"ancestry":[{"id":13957,"edition_id":1,"name":"Witnesses Generally","identifier":"4","label":"article","depth":3,"order_by":1,"parent_id":12870,"metadata":{},"date_created":"2026-06-26 03:46:25","date_modified":"2026-06-26 03:46:25","permalink":{"id":277427,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":13957,"identifier":"4","token":"8.01\/14\/4","url":"\/8.01\/14\/4\/","edition_id":1,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":12870,"edition_id":1,"name":"Evidence","identifier":"14","label":"chapter","depth":2,"order_by":1,"parent_id":12747,"metadata":{},"date_created":"2026-06-26 03:43:57","date_modified":"2026-06-26 03:43:57","permalink":{"id":277357,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":12870,"identifier":"14","token":"8.01\/14","url":"\/8.01\/14\/","edition_id":1,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":12747,"edition_id":1,"name":"Civil Remedies and Procedure","identifier":"8.01","label":"title","depth":1,"order_by":1,"parent_id":null,"metadata":{},"date_created":"2026-06-26 03:43:51","date_modified":"2026-06-26 03:43:51","permalink":{"id":277029,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":12747,"identifier":"8.01","token":"8.01","url":"\/8.01\/","edition_id":1,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}}],"structure_contents":[{"id":74141,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-396","catch_line":"No person incompetent to testify by reason of interest, or because a party","url":"\/8.01-396\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-396","metadata":false},{"id":86691,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-396.1","catch_line":"Competency of witness","url":"\/8.01-396.1\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-396.1","metadata":false},{"id":69399,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-396.2","catch_line":"Minor witness; appointment of guardian ad litem","url":"\/8.01-396.2\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-396.2","metadata":false},{"id":84174,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-397","catch_line":"Corroboration required and evidence receivable when one party incapable of testifying (subdivision (b)(5) of Supreme Court Rule 2:804 derived from this section)","url":"\/8.01-397\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-397","metadata":false},{"id":55017,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-397.1","catch_line":"Evidence of habit or routine practice; defined (Supreme Court Rule 2:406 derived from this section)","url":"\/8.01-397.1\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-397.1","metadata":false},{"id":85559,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-398","catch_line":"Privileged marital communications (Subsection (a) of Supreme Court Rule 2:504 derived from this section)","url":"\/8.01-398\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-398","metadata":false},{"id":82405,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-399","catch_line":"Communications between physicians and patients (Supreme Court Rule 2:505 derived from this section)","url":"\/8.01-399\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-399","metadata":false},{"id":61689,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-400","catch_line":"Communications between ministers of religion and persons they counsel or advise (Supreme Court Rule 2:503 derived in part from this section)","url":"\/8.01-400\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-400","metadata":false},{"id":62595,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-400.1","catch_line":"Privileged communications by interpreters for the deaf (Supreme Court Rule 2:507 derived in part from this section)","url":"\/8.01-400.1\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-400.1","metadata":false},{"id":74220,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-400.2","catch_line":"Communications between certain mental health professionals and clients (Supreme Court Rule 2:506 derived from this section)","url":"\/8.01-400.2\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-400.2","metadata":false},{"id":85143,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-401","catch_line":"How adverse party may be examined; effect of refusal to testify (subsection (b) of Supreme Court Rule 2:607 and subsection (c) of Supreme Court Rule 2:611 derived from subsection A of this section)","url":"\/8.01-401\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-401","metadata":false},{"id":64009,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-401.1","catch_line":"Opinion testimony by experts; hearsay exception (subsection (a) of Supreme Court Rule 2:703, subsection (a) of Supreme Court Rule 2:705, and subsection (a) of Supreme Court Rule 2:706 derived from this section)","url":"\/8.01-401.1\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-401.1","metadata":false},{"id":62896,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-401.2","catch_line":"Chiropractor, physician assistant, advanced practice registered nurse, or optometrist as expert witness","url":"\/8.01-401.2\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-401.2","metadata":false},{"id":59359,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-401.2:1","catch_line":"Podiatrist as an expert witness","url":"\/8.01-401.2_1\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-401.2_1","metadata":false},{"id":56378,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-401.3","catch_line":"Opinion testimony and conclusions as to facts critical to civil case resolution (Supreme Court Rule 2:701 derived from subsection B of this section, subdivision (a)(i) of Supreme Court Rule 2:702 derived from subsection A of this section, and subsection (a) of Supreme Court Rule 2:704 derived from subsections B and C of this section)","url":"\/8.01-401.3\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-401.3","metadata":false},{"id":55390,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-402","catch_line":"Members of Department of Motor Vehicles' Crash Investigation Team not to be required to give evidence in certain cases","url":"\/8.01-402\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-402","metadata":false},{"id":74616,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-403","catch_line":"Witness proving adverse; contradiction; prior inconsistent statement (Subsection (c) of Supreme Court Rule 2:607 and subdivision (a)(i) of Supreme Court Rule 2:613 derived from this section)","url":"\/8.01-403\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-403","metadata":false},{"id":72125,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-404","catch_line":"Contradiction by prior inconsistent writing (Subdivision (b)(i) of Supreme Court Rule 2:613 derived in part from this section and subdivision (b)(ii) of Supreme Court Rule 2:613 derived from this section)","url":"\/8.01-404\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-404","metadata":false},{"id":60442,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-405","catch_line":"Who may administer oath to witness","url":"\/8.01-405\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-405","metadata":false},{"id":83241,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-406","catch_line":"Interpreters; recording testimony of deaf witness (Supreme Court Rule 2:604 derived from this section)","url":"\/8.01-406\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-406","metadata":false}],"previous_section":{"id":69399,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-396.2","catch_line":"Minor witness; appointment of guardian ad litem","url":"\/8.01-396.2\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-396.2","metadata":false},"next_section":{"id":55017,"structure_id":13957,"section_number":"8.01-397.1","catch_line":"Evidence of habit or routine practice; defined (Supreme Court Rule 2:406 derived from this section)","url":"\/8.01-397.1\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-397.1","metadata":false},"metadata":false,"official_url":"https:\/\/law.lis.virginia.gov\/vacode\/8.01-397\/","history_text":"<p>The record of this law\u2019s original creation isn\u2019t available online. It has been modified 3 times. Those modifications are cataloged by \u201cThe Acts of Assembly,\u201d a state publication, by year and chapter. Those modifications that can be read on the General Assembly\u2019s website will be linked accordingly. Those modifications are as follows: in 1977, chapter 617; in 1988, chapter 426; in 2013, chapters <a href=\"https:\/\/legacylis.virginia.gov\/cgi-bin\/legp604.exe?131+ful+CHAP0061\">61<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/legacylis.virginia.gov\/cgi-bin\/legp604.exe?131+ful+CHAP0637\">637<\/a>.<\/p>","references":false,"refers_to":false,"permalink":{"id":277441,"object_type":"law","relational_id":84174,"identifier":"8.01-397","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-397","url":"\/8.01-397\/","edition_id":1,"permalink":0,"preferred":1},"url":"\/8.01-397\/","token":"8.01\/14\/4\/8.01-397","dublin_core":{"Title":"Corroboration required and evidence receivable when one party incapable of testifying (subdivision (b)(5) of Supreme Court Rule 2:804 derived from this section)","Type":"Text","Format":"text\/html","Identifier":"\u00a7 8.01-397","Relation":"Code of Virginia"},"html":"\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section><p>In an <span class=\"dictionary\">action<\/span> by or against a <span class=\"dictionary\">person<\/span> who, from any cause, is incapable of testifying, or by or against the committee, trustee, executor, administrator, heir, or other representative of the <span class=\"dictionary\">person<\/span> so incapable of testifying, no <span class=\"dictionary\">judgment<\/span> or <span class=\"dictionary\">decree<\/span> shall be rendered in favor of an adverse or interested <span class=\"dictionary\">party<\/span> founded on his uncorroborated <span class=\"dictionary\">testimony<\/span>. In any such <span class=\"dictionary\">action<\/span>, whether such adverse <span class=\"dictionary\">party<\/span> testifies or not, all entries, memoranda, and declarations by the <span class=\"dictionary\">party<\/span> so incapable of testifying made while he was capable, relevant to the matter in <span class=\"dictionary\">issue<\/span>, may be received as <span class=\"dictionary\">evidence<\/span> in all proceedings including without limitation those to which a <span class=\"dictionary\">person<\/span> under a disability is a <span class=\"dictionary\">party<\/span>. The phrase &#8220;from any cause&#8221; as used in this section shall not include situations in which the <span class=\"dictionary\">party<\/span> who is incapable of testifying has rendered himself unable to testify by an intentional self-inflicted injury.\n\t\tFor the purposes of this section, and in addition to corroboration by any other competent <span class=\"dictionary\">evidence<\/span>, an entry authored by an adverse or interested <span class=\"dictionary\">party<\/span> contained in a business record may be competent <span class=\"dictionary\">evidence<\/span> for corroboration of the <span class=\"dictionary\">testimony<\/span> of an adverse or interested <span class=\"dictionary\">party<\/span>. If authentication of the business record is not admitted in a request for admission, such business record shall be authenticated by a <span class=\"dictionary\">person<\/span> other than the author of the entry who is not an adverse or interested <span class=\"dictionary\">party<\/span> whose conduct is at <span class=\"dictionary\">issue<\/span> in the <span class=\"dictionary\">allegations<\/span> of the complaint.<\/p><\/section>","plain_text":"                                 CODE OF VIRGINIA\n\nCORROBORATION REQUIRED AND EVIDENCE RECEIVABLE WHEN ONE PARTY INCAPABLE OF\nTESTIFYING (SUBDIVISION (B)(5) OF SUPREME COURT RULE 2:804 DERIVED FROM THIS\nSECTION) (\u00a7 8.01-397)\n\nIn an action by or against a person who, from any cause, is incapable of\ntestifying, or by or against the committee, trustee, executor, administrator,\nheir, or other representative of the person so incapable of testifying, no\njudgment or decree shall be rendered in favor of an adverse or interested party\nfounded on his uncorroborated testimony. In any such action, whether such\nadverse party testifies or not, all entries, memoranda, and declarations by the\nparty so incapable of testifying made while he was capable, relevant to the\nmatter in issue, may be received as evidence in all proceedings including\nwithout limitation those to which a person under a disability is a party. The\nphrase &#8220;from any cause&#8221; as used in this section shall not include\nsituations in which the party who is incapable of testifying has rendered\nhimself unable to testify by an intentional self-inflicted injury.\n\t\tFor the purposes of this section, and in addition to corroboration by any\nother competent evidence, an entry authored by an adverse or interested party\ncontained in a business record may be competent evidence for corroboration of\nthe testimony of an adverse or interested party. If authentication of the\nbusiness record is not admitted in a request for admission, such business record\nshall be authenticated by a person other than the author of the entry who is not\nan adverse or interested party whose conduct is at issue in the allegations of\nthe complaint.\n\nHISTORY: Code 1950, \u00a7 8-286; 1977, c. 617; 1988, c. 426; 2013, cc. 61, 637.","edition":{"id":1,"name":"2025","slug":"2025","date_created":"2026-06-21 22:39:22","date_modified":"2026-06-21 22:39:22","current":1,"order_by":1,"last_import":null}}