<?xml version="1.0"?>
<law><site_title>Virginia Decoded</site_title><site_url>https://vacode.org</site_url><law_id>60331</law_id><section_number>18.2-268.11</section_number><catch_line>Substantial compliance</catch_line><edition url="https://vacode.org/2025/" slug="2025" current="TRUE" last_updated="">2025</edition><referred_to_by><reference>18.2-268.12</reference><reference>29.1-738.2</reference></referred_to_by><structure><unit label="title" level="1" order_by="1" identifier="18.2">Crimes and Offenses Generally</unit><unit label="chapter" level="2" order_by="1" identifier="7">Crimes Involving Health and Safety</unit><unit label="article" level="3" order_by="1" identifier="2">Driving Motor Vehicle, etc., While Intoxicated</unit></structure><text>
						<section><p>The steps set forth in &#xA7;&#xA7;&#xA0;<a class="law" title="Implied consent to post-arrest testing to determine drug or alcohol content of blood" href="/18.2-268.2/">18.2-268.2</a> through <a class="law" title="Assurance of breath-test validity; use of breath-test results as evidence" href="/18.2-268.9/">18.2-268.9</a> relating to taking, handling, identifying, and disposing of blood or breath samples are procedural and not substantive. Substantial compliance shall be sufficient. Failure to comply with any steps or portions thereof shall not of itself be grounds for <span class="dictionary">finding</span> the <span class="dictionary">defendant</span> not guilty, but shall go to the weight of the <span class="dictionary">evidence</span> and shall be considered with all the <span class="dictionary">evidence</span> in the case; however, the <span class="dictionary">defendant</span> shall have the right to introduce <span class="dictionary">evidence</span> on his own behalf to show noncompliance with the aforesaid procedures or any part thereof, and that as a result his rights were prejudiced.</p></section></text><history>1992, c. 830; 2003, cc. 933, 936.</history><metadata></metadata></law>
