                                 CODE OF VIRGINIA

TAGGING OF ADULTERATED OR MISBRANDED DRUGS, DEVICES, OR COSMETICS; CONDEMNATION;
DESTRUCTION; EXPENSES (§ 54.1-3459)

A. Whenever a duly authorized agent of the Board finds, or has probable cause to
believe, that any drug, device, or cosmetic is adulterated, or so misbranded as
to be dangerous or fraudulent, within the meaning of this chapter or is in
violation of &#xA7; 54.1-3457, he shall affix to such article a tag or other
appropriate marking, giving notice that such article is, or is suspected of
being, adulterated or misbranded or in violation of &#xA7; 54.1-3457 and has
been detained. The tag shall also warn all persons not to remove or dispose of
such article by sale or otherwise until permission for removal or disposal is
given by an authorized agent or the court. It shall be unlawful for any person
to remove or dispose of such detained article by sale or otherwise without
permission.

B. When an article is adulterated or misbranded or is in violation of &#xA7;
54.1-3421, the Board may petition the circuit court in whose jurisdiction the
article is detained for condemnation of such article. When an authorized agent
finds that an article which has been detained is not adulterated or misbranded,
or in violation of &#xA7; 54.1-3421, he shall remove the tag or other marking.

C. If the court finds that a detained article is adulterated or misbranded, or
in violation of &#xA7; 54.1-3421, such article shall, after entry of the decree,
be destroyed at the expense of the claimant, under the supervision of an
authorized agent, and all court costs and fees, and storage and other proper
expenses, shall be levied against the claimant or his agent. When the
adulteration or misbranding can be corrected by proper labeling or processing of
the article, the court shall order the article to be properly labeled or
processed. The expense of the supervision shall be paid by the claimant. The
article shall be returned to the claimant and the bond shall be discharged on
the representation to the court by the Board that the article is no longer in
violation of this chapter, and that the expenses of such supervision have been
paid.

HISTORY: 1970, c. 650, § 54-524.88; 1988, c. 765.